60 Comments

Matt, I’ve been an on and off reader of yours since the Bush years and Rolling Stone. In the past few weeks, I’ve read Hate Inc (via audiobook) and was stunned to find another liberal whose take on the modern political conversation is so close to the things I’ve been screaming at MSNBC and the New York Times that somehow make all my liberal friends think I’m a Trump supporter. Except all organized and stuff! Now I’m going back and bingeing Useful Idiots. Your work is incredibly necessary. Keep writing and podcasting. I’m listening.

Expand full comment

Why would you apologize for offering the book through an independent book company - at any price - rather than having to order through Amazon who - in addition to all of their other sordid activities - was just fined 68 million dollars (pocket change to them ) for essentially screwing their delivery drivers out of their tips?

Expand full comment

Any chance of getting an audiobook edition read by either Christopher Walken or Ice-T?

Expand full comment

Will the kindle version be updated?

Expand full comment

Glad it's selling well. Congrats!

You should do an article that allows us to discuss the book.

Expand full comment

Thinking over the premise of Hate Inc has got me thinking about what a truly neutral fact-based news source would look like. Matt, what are your thoughts on Wikipedia? They’re certainly an example of a “tech giant” that has gone out of its way not to monetize, and they’re probably used and trusted equally by the left and right. They don’t market themselves as “news”, but any major news story will have a page up in minutes. There is vigorous debate over content in plain sight, and I have no idea how many people are involved in the writing, but it’s voice is the closest thing to the vox populi I can think of.

Expand full comment

Ah just bad timing from Rogan’s plug. Good problem to have.

Expand full comment

Ordered.

Matt - curious about one aspect of the election. During the primaries you and Ms. Halper were really skeptical of Biden's chances against Trump, and pretty bullish about Sanders. Some of that was pre-pandemic, of course, but was there anything that happened during the election that made you question your initial views on Biden's chances? I don't mean this as a gotcha question, or anything else. Really appreciate your work.

Expand full comment

Dear Matt Taibbi,

I can't find an email address so I will state my question here: what do you think of the investment by a figure like Craig Newmark, billionaire philanthropist and founder of Craig's List, in projects for "bettering journalism" by "fighting the information war"? I was at first considering sending an application to the Eyebeam Foundation, which announces a grant for artists who dabble in investigative journalism and who want to work on a topic related to the abuse of technology. However, upon reading on the recipients, I noticed they seem to favour artists applying for a grant to make 3d models and maps of Chinese concentration camps or other Cold War type activities, which I guess should be paid directly in large sums by the CIA without forcing agitprop artists to first apply for a meagre grant. I hope to have your thoughts and information on Craig Newmark's investment in "resistance journalism" and Cold war.

kind regards,

Arturo Desimone (substack subscriber putting subscription on temp hiatus later this month)

Expand full comment

«looking back at the Trump years»

Part of that is not just media excess, but also their victims, and I just noticed a truly amazing example of extreme TDS from an otherwise reasonable and mild NYC law professor:

http://danshaviro.blogspot.com/2021/01/trump-and-bin-laden.html

“Trump is one of two people - Bin Laden is the other - to have orchestrated a violent attack on the US Capitol Building in the last twenty years. (The Capitol Building is believed to have been Flight 93's target.) Both were acts of war against the United States, although Bin Laden's was a foreign attack and Trump's a domestic one. Trump's attack not only came closer to success - they actually breached the building - but aimed to do far more to destroy our institutions and way of life. Bin Laden's was a raid, meant to terrorize and provoke a response that would feed further escalation of ongoing global conflicts. Trump's was meant to decapitate the legislative branch, with accompanying mass murder and hostage-taking, and to put a permanent end to democratic (small-d) governance in the United States.

After 9/11, there was (to say the least) no U.S. domestic support for Bin Laden. Given that what Trump attempted was just as bad, and indeed in some ways worse, it is remarkable that he should retain any domestic support or even tolerance, outside of the most extreme terrorist elements in our country.”

That “acts of war against the United States [...] Trump's was meant to decapitate the legislative branch, with accompanying mass murder and hostage-taking” is fantastic (in the literal sense). But I have found other TDS victims claiming that a massacre of members of Congress was only narrowly avoided.

Hate Inc. subsidiaries have worked hard to bring TDS to such extreme levels, and their success is remarkable indeed.

Expand full comment
founding

I am listening to the Jordan Peterson Sunday Times interview full audio right now. The gap between this long audio and what is reported on the interview and the Twitter takeaways is massive of course. It spurred a thought: are we basically entering a situation where part of the cultural gap is the dichotomy between those who practice soundbyte and headline reactivity (Twittersphere and its trending towards the Borg) and those who entertain deep thought and long form discussion (a la Joe Rogan and Matt's book)?

Anyway this part of the interview is tremendously affecting: https://youtu.be/Fd2wKn6-X_A?t=467

Expand full comment
founding

Congrats on the success of the book, Matt. It's well-earned and it's rewarding to see that this will get the message out there a bit more.

Our culture has devolved into two separate monologues driven by the combined forces of social media pushing triggering, scary news (a la the Social Dilemma) and the media business model changing to favor pushing triggering, scary news (even more than it used to). So now we have triggered, scared people on both sides and a bunch of us sitting here in the middle that have been wondering for a while what the heck has been going on. Thanks for helping us figure it out.

Expand full comment

"The new edition delves into these issues, asking how the Trump era accelerated the divisiveness industry, and what some of the consequences of this might have been".

And the level of maturity, professionalism, compassion and openness by the Democrats, the MSM, and the Biden administration is truly inspiring. The words and actions of kindness, calm, and rationality has been a lesson for the entire world. It's such a huge difference. /s.

Can you seriously look at the idiots in this Admin, the MSM, and the Left and think for one second that it's better? Wake up, this is war and all they're doing is making it worse. This is 1858 and Fort Sumter is not that far away.

Expand full comment

I ended up with a hardback copy and a paperback copy of the original. Can't keep track of what I order. Anyway, looks like I'll be getting a third copy...direct from OR Books.

Expand full comment

I do wonder how long it will be before Facebook bans any advertising of Hate Inc. due to, you know, being filled with hate ;)

Expand full comment

Cool to see the JR Plug. I actually ordered the book before Christmas and my local book store told me to wait until February with the new edition. Looking forward to it!

Expand full comment